|
Standards by Competency and/or Domain |
Explanation of Competency and/or Domain and
Reflection of Growth in this Area |
Evidence |
|
Standards for Reading Professionals # 4:
Learners use their language
skills in all curriculum areas; thus, proficiency in language arts is
central for doing well in school and in becoming lifelong literacy
practitioners.
|
This standard is simply
stating that language skills affect all areas of curriculum including
technology, writing, science, reading, math, social studies, and public
speaking. Without proficient language skills, students struggle throughout
their educational career and even through adulthood. Although it is simply
stated, the fact that language is a central element in all of education is
not a simple concept to teach to parents and to students. Through
the reading of 20 articles and through discussions in a class of 20
students, I have learned that language is the key component to
producing successful learners. Before this course, I did not understand the
concept of “Critical Literacy” but as shown in my email correspondence with
my professor, I developed a deeper understanding of this concept and how it
applied to my students. Children who learn to master language are empowered
to be life long learners and are successful in school. |
Response to Article 1 : Session 4 : Life Long
Learners
Email correspondence with Dr. Hirtle: Critical
Literacy |
|
Standards for Reading
Professionals # 6:
Language takes many forms; its diversity must be
respected.
|
This standard calls us to be understanding and
appreciative of diversity in language. Whether it is in style of writing,
in dialect, in printed format, in poetry, in cultural background, or in
dramatic play. Language is a tool for people to express their ideas,
thoughts, and feelings with others. I have grown a great deal in this area
and have developed an appreciation for the diversity of language. Several
of my links show evidence of this growth but most clear is the fact that in
the past two months I have purchased several multicultural books, poetry
books and noticed my understanding of different cultures in working with
others. These are intangibles but are proof of change in action. |
Research Project On Nonverbal
Language
Evidence: Response to Article
1: Session 1
Click To See Images of Poetry Books
Evidence: Response to
Article #1 : Session 5: "Poetry Cafe"
Evidence:
Response to Article #2: Session 4 [Part]:
Drawing and Writing Metacognition |
|
Standards for Reading
Professionals # 14.1:
Appropriately prepared
reading professionals have proficiency in three broad categories:
1. Knowledge and Beliefs About Reading, which
includes understanding theories of reading development, individual
differences, the nature of reading difficulties, and principles of
assessment.
|
This standard expresses the need for teachers to
understand the reading process and development. Teachers must recognize how
students learn differently and how to approach reading problems. Teachers
need to understand how to help students overcome reading difficulties and
how to assess for these findings. I have grown a great deal in this
category also. I believe I have a deeper understanding of reading problems
and ways to address these issues. I believe my approach to assess these
matters may now be different. There are so many different components of the
reading process and all students have strengths and weaknesses. My Case
Study is evidence of growth and understanding in specific reading problems.
Some of the articles I read gave me deeper understanding of the process of
reading development and the appreciation of language. |
Case Study
Evidence:
Response to Article #1 - Session 2
Evidence: Response to Article #2 :
Session 5 [Part]: Mining for Gems |
|
Standards for Reading Professionals # 15.2:
Appropriately prepared reading professionals have
proficiency in three broad categories:
2. Instruction and Assessment, which includes
being able to create instructional environments; to teach word
identification, phonemic awareness, letter-sound correspondence, vocabulary
skills, strategies for comprehension and the construction of meaning, and
study strategies; and to assess student performance and progress.
|
This standard expresses that reading professionals need
to create the proper environment for learning, understand the components of
reading and language development, and know how to assess these elements. My
growth is best shown through my class discussions with peers. I also have
grown in the concept of self assessment. I have even developed my own
writing rubric. |
Discussions with my peers on making learning
enjoyable and meaningful.
Self Assessment thoughts in Article 1 response
from Session 4
Discussion with my peers on assessment
Primary Trait Scoring Guide |
|
Standards for Reading
Professionals # 16.3:
Appropriately prepared
reading professionals have proficiency in three broad categories:
3. Organizing and Enhancing a Reading Program,
which includes abilities to communicate information about reading to various
groups, to develop literacy curricula, to participate in or lead
professional-development programs, to participate in or conduct research, to
collaborate or supervise other literacy practitioners, to communicate
assessment results, and to engage in professional activities.
|
This final standard suggests that teachers must have a
professional network of fellow educators. Teachers need to get involved in
groups that can challenge them in their abilities to communicate on
education and that can be sounding boards for educational ideas. Having a
supportive group of educators can empower teachers to reach beyond their
comfort zones and can facilitate in Action Research projects. My growth in
this area can be seen in my new membership to Listserv and NCTE. I have
actively participated in both groups and have assimilated the need for a
professional community. |
Response to Article 2 in session 1: Professional
Organizations
Listserv Observations
http://www.ncte.org/member/ NCTE membership
|