Home
5325 Portfolio
Discussions
Contact Information
READ 5389
Power Point
EDUC 5309
Images.htm

                                   Portfolio

                                                                 of

                                                    Kimberly Frazier

 

During the eleven weeks of READ 5325: Current Trends in Language Arts, I have learned a great deal towards my understanding of the National Standards for Reading Professionals.  I took these standards from the following website: http://www.reading.org/advocacy/standards/part1.html

The purpose of my portfolio is to show my growth in understanding and fulfilling the following standards and to demonstrate support or evidence of this development.

 

Standards by Competency and/or Domain

Explanation of Competency and/or Domain and Reflection of Growth in this Area

 

Evidence

Standards for Reading Professionals # 4:

 

Learners use their language skills in all curriculum areas; thus, proficiency in language arts is central for doing well in school and in becoming lifelong literacy practitioners.

 

 

This standard is simply stating that language skills affect all areas of curriculum including technology, writing, science, reading, math, social studies, and public speaking.  Without proficient language skills, students struggle throughout their educational career and even through adulthood.  Although it is simply stated, the fact that language is a central element in all of education is not a simple concept to teach to parents and to students.  Through the reading of 20 articles and through discussions in a class of 20 students, I have learned that language is the key component to producing successful learners.  Before this course, I did not understand the concept of “Critical Literacy” but as shown in my email correspondence with my professor, I developed a deeper understanding of this concept and how it applied to my students. Children who learn to master language are empowered to be life long learners and are successful in school. 

 

 

Response to Article 1 : Session 4 : Life Long Learners

 

Email correspondence with Dr. Hirtle: Critical Literacy

Standards for Reading Professionals # 6:

 

Language takes many forms; its diversity must be respected.

 

 

This standard calls us to be understanding and appreciative of diversity in language.  Whether it is in style of writing, in dialect, in printed format, in poetry, in cultural background, or in dramatic play.  Language is a tool for people to express their ideas, thoughts, and feelings with others.  I have grown a great deal in this area and have developed an appreciation for the diversity of language.  Several of my links show evidence of this growth but most clear is the fact that in the past two months I have purchased several multicultural books, poetry books and noticed my understanding of different cultures in working with others.  These are intangibles but are proof of change in action. 

 

Research Project On Nonverbal Language

 

Evidence: Response to Article 1: Session 1

Click To See Images of Poetry Books

Evidence:  Response to Article #1 : Session 5: "Poetry Cafe"

 

Evidence:   Response to Article #2:  Session 4 [Part]:  Drawing and Writing Metacognition

Standards for Reading Professionals # 14.1:

 

Appropriately prepared reading professionals have proficiency in three broad categories:

 

1. Knowledge and Beliefs About Reading, which includes understanding theories of reading development, individual differences, the nature of reading difficulties, and principles of assessment.

 

 

This standard expresses the need for teachers to understand the reading process and development.  Teachers must recognize how students learn differently and how to approach reading problems.  Teachers need to understand how to help students overcome reading difficulties and how to assess for these findings.  I have grown a great deal in this category also. I believe I have a deeper understanding of reading problems and ways to address these issues.  I believe my approach to assess these matters may now be different.  There are so many different components of the reading process and all students have strengths and weaknesses.  My Case Study is evidence of growth and understanding in specific reading problems.  Some of the articles I read gave me deeper understanding of the process of reading development and the appreciation of language.

 

 

 

Case Study

 

Evidence:   Response to Article #1 - Session 2

 

Evidence:  Response to Article #2 : Session 5 [Part]:  Mining for Gems

Standards for Reading Professionals # 15.2:

 

Appropriately prepared reading professionals have proficiency in three broad categories:

 

2. Instruction and Assessment, which includes being able to create instructional environments; to teach word identification, phonemic awareness, letter-sound correspondence, vocabulary skills, strategies for comprehension and the construction of meaning, and study strategies; and to assess student performance and progress.

 

 

 

 

 

This standard expresses that reading professionals need to create the proper environment for learning, understand the components of reading and language development, and know how to assess these elements.  My growth is best shown through my class discussions with peers. I also have grown in the concept of self assessment.  I have even developed my own writing rubric.

 

Discussions with my peers on making learning enjoyable and meaningful.

 

Self Assessment thoughts in Article 1 response from Session 4

 

Discussion with my peers on assessment

 

Primary Trait Scoring Guide

Standards for Reading Professionals # 16.3:

 

Appropriately prepared reading professionals have proficiency in three broad categories:

 

3. Organizing and Enhancing a Reading Program, which includes abilities to communicate information about reading to various groups, to develop literacy curricula, to participate in or lead professional-development programs, to participate in or conduct research, to collaborate or supervise other literacy practitioners, to communicate assessment results, and to engage in professional activities.

 

 

 

This final standard suggests that teachers must have a professional network of fellow educators.  Teachers need to get involved in groups that can challenge them in their abilities to communicate on education and that can be sounding boards for educational ideas.  Having a supportive group of educators can empower teachers to reach beyond their comfort zones and can facilitate in Action Research projects.  My growth in this area can be seen in my new membership to Listserv and NCTE.  I have actively participated in both groups and have assimilated the need for a professional community.  

 

Response to Article 2 in session 1:  Professional Organizations

 

Listserv Observations

 

 

http://www.ncte.org/member/  NCTE membership

 

 

 

Home | 5325 Portfolio | Discussions | Contact Information | READ 5389 | Power Point | EDUC 5309 | Images.htm

 Copyright or other proprietary statement goes here.
For problems or questions regarding this web contact Web Administrator
Last updated: 04/07/03.